Supreme Court allows Grace Poe to run for president
March 8, 2016 at 16:45
Supreme Court allows Grace Poe to run for president
(5th UPDATE) The vote is 9-6 in favor of the presidential candidate
QUALIFIED. Senator Grace Poe starts her presidential bid in Plaza Miranda, Quiapo, Manila on February 9, 2016. File photo by Alecs Ongcal/Rappler
MANILA, Philippines (5th UPDATE) – In a landmark ruling, the Supreme Court (SC) decided to save Senator Grace Poe from disqualification as presidential candidate in the 2016 elections.
The SC en banc on Tuesday, March 8, voted 9-6 to reverse the decision of the Commission on Elections (Comelec) to cancel Poe’s certificate of candidacy (COC).
Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno was among the 9 justices who voted in favor of Poe. The rest are Presbitero Velasco Jr, Diosdado Peralta, Lucas Bersamin, Jose Perez, Jose Mendoza, Marvic Leonen, Francis Jardeleza, and Benjamin Caguioa.
Of the 9, four are appointees of President Benigno Aquino III: Sereno, Leonen, Jardeleza, and Caguioa.
The 6 justices who voted against Poe are Antonio Carpio, Teresita Leonardo-de Castro, Mariano del Castillo, Arturo Brion, Estela Perlas-Bernabe, and Bienvenido Reyes.
Of the 6, two are appointes of Aquino: Bernabe and Reyes. Three of them – Carpio, Brion and De Castro – were part of the Senate Electoral Tribunal that earlier voted in favor of Poe. The 3 justices dissented in that SET verdict, insisting that Poe is not a natural-born citizen. (READ: Why did SC justices vote to disqualify Grace Poe?)
The verdict came after recent surveys showed Poe as the front runner in the presidential race. (READ: Duterte, Poe, Binay, Roxas and a dead heat race)
In a statement released hours after the verdict, SC spokesman Theodore Te said: “I am authorized to say that there will be four concurring opinions to the Majority Decision, and five dissenting opinions. Please note that since the Court has only authorized the release of the vote, it may not be safe to report which ground the Court ruled upon and used as basis for the vote, i.e., between citizenship and residence. Thus, it may be best to simply say, the SC grants Senator Poe’s petitions, 9-6, allowing her to run for the presidency.”
The High Court heard oral arguments on the case for 5 Tuesdays, from January 19 to February 16. The SC justices interpellated Poe’s counsel Alex Poblador, Comelec’s lead counsel Arthur Lim, Solicitor General Florin Hilbay, and former University of the East Law Dean Amado Valdez.
During the oral arguments, the views of at least 3 justices showed they were leaning toward recognizing Poe as a natural-born Filipino and as having established residency before running for president: Sereno, Leonen and Jardeleza.
Sereno and Leonen focused on the rights of foundlings, while Jardeleza expressed his concern that the Comelec might have deprived Poe of her rights to due process.
3 bodies
Poe fought disqualification cases against her before 3 bodies: the SET, Comelec, and the SC.
It was a close vote at the SET. In November 2015, the SET voted 5-4 to deny the petition to disqualify Poe from the 2013 senatorial polls.
A month later, in December 2015, the Comelec en banc decided to dismiss Poe’s appeal to allow her to run. The commissioners voted separately on the two cases involving the senator’s citizenship and residency requirements: the one handled by the First Division and the other by the Second Division. Both divisions previously ruled against Poe.
At the SC, the oral arguments showed that the justices were split on at least least 4 key issues on the case. (READ: 4 key issues that divide SC justices in the Poe case) – Rappler.com
Source: https://www.rappler.com/nation
