charter change
Charter change has ‘fair chance’ this time
12 October, 2011 at 10:18
The fresh initiative to amend the Constitution has a “fair chance” of succeeding this time around despite lack of support from President
Back to Charter change
11 October, 2011 at 14:28
This is a re-posted opinion piece. The year 2009 was another year of varied attempts to achieve Charter change. None succeeded. The last was the
Aquino will see the light on Charter...
7 October, 2011 at 18:29
Senator Franklin Drilon believes that once plenary debates on amending the Constitution begin in Congress, President Benigno Aquino III will be
Charter change focuses on economics
7 October, 2011 at 18:15
This is a re-posted opinion piece. Charter change in the past was unpopular because of the general belief that it was a ploy of incumbent
Congress to pursue Cha-cha despite reluctance of...
6 October, 2011 at 15:45
MANILA, Philippines – Congress will continue its efforts to amend the economic provisions of the 1987 Constitution despite the reluctance of
‘Stable economy, not Cha-cha, to bring in...
6 October, 2011 at 15:27
MANILA, Philippines – Amending the economic provisions of the Constitution is no guarantee for faster growth or bigger foreign investments,
No need to amend Constitution—Aquino spokesman
5 October, 2011 at 12:02
MANILA, Philippines – There is no need to amend the Constitution even if the changes will only affect economic provisions, President Benigno
Drilon: ‘Now is best time to amend...
5 October, 2011 at 12:00
This is a re-posted Senate press release. Changes to the economic provisions of the Constitution should be introduced now, with Senator Franklin
Prioritize Economy in Charter change — Angara
5 October, 2011 at 11:55
This is a re-posted Senate press release. Senator Edgardo J. Angara stressed the need to prioritize changing restrictive policies on foreign
Enrile-Lagman tiff over Charter change looms
4 October, 2011 at 17:53
SENATE President Juan Ponce Enrile and House Minority Leader Edcel Lagman are heading for “war” over arguments on the unconstitutionality of a
